马口鱼在不同障碍物下的游泳行为

Study on the swimming behavior of minnows under different obstacles

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究鱼类在复杂水流中的适应机理,可通过设置障碍物模拟天然河流湍流环境,分析其行为响应及其能量代谢。
    方法 本实验在封闭式游泳能力测试水槽中测定马口鱼在不同型式障碍物下的临界游泳速度并分析其游泳行为。
    结果 不同型式障碍物条件下马口鱼的相对临界游泳速度存在差异。方柱条件下的相对临界游泳速度为(8.18±0.96) BL/s显著高于圆柱(6.35±1.47) BL/s和半圆柱(7.27±0.70) BL/s,而圆柱、半圆柱与空白来流条件下差异不显著。通过统计马口鱼在不同型式障碍物下发生水力藏匿行为的时间比,提取其游泳动力学指标(摆尾频率、摆尾幅度、身体侧向加速度和最大转角)。发现方柱条件下马口鱼水力藏匿行为发生时间比例最高,圆柱与半圆柱条件下差异不显著。在三种柱体障碍物干扰的水流中,马口鱼在柱前弓形尾流区的停留时间比例均为最大。在同一流速(5.08 BL/s)下,方柱条件下马口鱼的摆尾频率显著低于圆柱和半圆柱,而摆尾幅度和身体侧向加速度显著高于圆柱和半圆柱。圆柱条件下马口鱼的最大转角显著大于半圆柱和方柱,方柱与半圆柱差异不显著。
    结论 比较三种型式障碍物下的游泳行为可知,方柱型障碍物更有利于马口鱼在通过水流屏障时节省能量消耗。本研究可为鱼道内障碍物的优化设计提供依据,以降低鱼类通过鱼道的能量消耗,提升通过效率。

     

    Abstract: Riverine fish often encounter complex hydrodynamic environments containing turbulence, wake structures, and physical obstacles during migration and routine movement. These flow conditions can significantly influence swimming performance, energy expenditure, and behavioral strategies. Understanding how fish respond to different obstacle-induced flow fields is essential for ecological studies and for improving the design of fish passage facilities. However, quantitative evidence on how obstacle geometry affects locomotor behavior and energetic efficiency remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the adaptive responses of Opsariichthys bidens to different obstacle shapes under controlled flow conditions, focusing on swimming behavior, critical swimming speed, and energy-saving mechanisms. The objective was to clarify how hydrodynamic structures generated by different obstacles influence fish movement efficiency and to provide guidance for fishway optimization. Experiments were conducted in a closed-circuit swimming performance flume. Three obstacle geometries—square column, circular column, and semicircular column—were installed to simulate different hydrodynamic disturbances. The critical swimming speed was measured for each condition. Behavioral parameters were analyzed, including tail-beat frequency, tail-beat amplitude, body lateral acceleration, maximum turning angle, and the proportion of hydrodynamic sheltering behavior. Fish residence time in wake regions was also quantified. Flow velocity was standardized at 5.08 body lengths per second (BL/s) for behavioral comparisons. Results showed significant differences in relative critical swimming speed among obstacle types. Under square column conditions, the critical swimming speed was (8.18±0.96) BL/s, which was significantly higher than that observed under circular column (6.35±1.47) BL/s and semicircular column (7.27±0.70) BL/s conditions. No significant difference was detected between circular, semicircular, and control (uniform flow) treatments. Behavioral analysis indicated that hydrodynamic sheltering behavior was most frequently observed under square column conditions. Fish consistently spent the highest proportion of time in the bow wake region upstream of all obstacle types. At 5.08 BL/s, tail-beat frequency under square columns was significantly lower than that under circular and semicircular columns, whereas tail-beat amplitude and lateral body acceleration were significantly higher. In addition, circular column conditions induced the largest maximum turning angle, significantly greater than those observed under semicircular and square configurations, while no significant difference was found between square and semicircular obstacles. These results demonstrate that obstacle geometry strongly influences swimming kinematics and energy utilization strategies in O. bidens. Square obstacles generate more stable and predictable wake structures, allowing fish to exploit hydrodynamic sheltering more efficiently and reduce locomotor energy costs during upstream movement. In conclusion, square column obstacles provide more favorable hydrodynamic conditions for energy-efficient swimming compared with circular and semicircular forms. These findings highlight the importance of obstacle shape in regulating fish behavior and energetics and provide valuable empirical evidence for optimizing fishway design. The results suggest that engineering fish passage structures with appropriately shaped obstacles may improve passage efficiency and reduce energetic burdens, thereby supporting river connectivity and freshwater biodiversity conservation.

     

/

返回文章
返回